New2view's Blog   Life on The Blue Marble

Some time ago a friend, who believes, just as I do, that so-called ‘organic evolution’ has no facts to support it, but is really a false ‘doctrine’ adopted by its strongest believers.

And yet the actual use of the term “evolution” is defended by that same friend as applied to ‘inorganic’ matter, such as the amazing ongoing creation of stars!

I wish to fully condemn use of that word description because it has a misleading inference, even an possibly unintended corrupting influence.

Surely terms like ‘progression, expansion, or growth’ to name a few, are much more appropriate and apt adjectives or adverbs, than ‘evolution‘ to describe changes to inanimate objects!?

I simply don’t believe its ‘splitting hairs’ to condemn use of that term, in ‘any’ context whatsoever! To me its a misleading word, a pure invention of pseudo science! At best it may mislead an uninformed general public, possibly even undermining belief in ‘factual’ creation.

So in my humble opinion its simply inappropriate, the ‘thin edge of the wedge’, because by association it may subtly contribute to acceptance of a gross lie, namely ‘organic’ evolution.

All that said; of course I cannot determine anyone’s choice of words, but only kindly ask that common use of this word be rejected.

Please visit my post for more info on this subject: Evolution Critique