Once again the media is simply thrilled to report on a factually unsupported discovery of fossils, stating they were a stepping stone in evolution.
How unscientific is this? First of all these bones cannot and will not be dated accurately by any known means, and I do include carbon dating which is a notoriously flawed method.
But not only that, these bones are quantitatively similar to basically contemporary, so called ‘modern’ human bones, not at all evolutionary in kind.
No, once again, efforts to support the false doctrine of ‘evil-lution’ proves to be the figment of human imagination, and promotion, period.
Mark Train wrote: ” There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.”
(Preceding the above quote by Twain, he noted that the Mississippi had shortened 1.2 miles per year for 100 years. At that rate, he stated, the Mississippi had extended past Cuba in the past, and would someday be only a couple miles long in the future. Of course he was being sarcastic. THAT is the type of irrational thinking that assigns such ages to our earth. Scientifically, since we know the moon moves away from the earth each year, the moon would be in the center of the earth, as an example. I have yet to see ANY scientific FACTS to support that age assumption. Even the venerable Pottasium/Argon dating is irreleveant: the 1975 Volcanic eruption in NZ was dated by America’ finest argon lab to be 2 million years old. As Twain stated . . .)
Discover more from New2view's Blog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply