Evolution vs Creation   1 comment

Copyright; Gavin Hurlimann (slightly edited) Note: this article supplements my own ‘Evolution Critique’ posting.

 

 

 

The disciplines of science have already proven that the Christian God of the Bible exists because the solid, rigid, fixed & unbreakable laws of physics.

To avoid fish hooks, confusion & for the ease of the reader; let’s be VERY EXACT with our terms & definitions. 

The Laws of Thermodynamics are concerned with heat, mechanical energy, and the conversion between the two. All physical, biological, & chemical processes known to man are subject to these laws. Science often speaks of four (4) laws of thermodynamics, but only two (2) have any meaningful connection to Christianity.

They are the first (1st) & second (2nd) laws of thermodynamics.

It’s important to note that these “Laws” are not a hypothesis. They are fixed, rigid, consistent & unbreakable by anything/anyone in the natural world.

1) The first (1st) law of thermodynamics – also known as the conservation of energy – states; “Nothing is presently coming into existence or going out of existence: matter & energy may be converted into one another, but there’s no net increase in the combined total of what exists”.

In other words, even if matter is converted to energy and vice versa, there will never be an “increase or decrease” in the total amount.

Therefore, if the matter and energy are neither created nor destroyed, then where did all the matter and energy in the universe come from?

Either;

a) the universe somehow came into existence without God, even though science has proved that it is impossible for something to arise out of nothing,

b) everything always existed in the universe, an idea that science has also proved impossible, or

c) God created it. This “is” most reasonable, plausible & rational explanation in light of this scientific Law & the following Laws & evidence.

1st Conclusion:

Science openly acknowledges that according to the first (1st) Law of Thermodynamics, there is no scientific explanation for the origins of the universe & life – apart from an Act of God.

2) The second (2nd) law of thermodynamics states that the entropy (breakdown or disorder) of a closed system cannot decrease, it only gets worse;

Every system, left to its own devices, always tends to move from order to diso, it’s energy tends to be transformed into lower levels of availability (for work), ultimately becoming totally random & unavailable for work”.

Scientist & author Isaac Asimov explains; “The universe is constantly getting more disorderly. . . . .all we have to do is “nothing” & everything deteriorates, collapses, breaks down, wears out, by itself – and that is what the second law of thermodynamics is all about.”

Two simple examples of entropy;

1) The exterior paint on an un-maintained house with eventually peel & fall off.

2) All human beings break down & die. The current death rate from old age is 100%.

In other words, left to itself & over time, everything tends toward disorder, randomness, and disorganization – unless there is intervention by an intelligent utility.

Naturalistic evolution “demands” that every physical system, from the atomic level on up, is the result of a spontaneous and increasingly complex and well-ordered process of assembly. Darwin suggested that living organisms, for instance, came about via a long string of infinitely complex, yet “random” evolutionary processes.

If planet Earth was an entirely closed system, such progression would be in complete violation of the second (2nd) law of thermodynamics. It’s important to note, however, that our planet is “NOT a closed system” in terms of thermodynamics, mostly because planet Earth is receiving energy from the sun.

However, the hypothesis of evolution runs contrary to the second (2nd) law of thermodynamics is on a general, large-scale view.

Entropy observed.

The trend, according to these unbreakable scientific laws, is that entropy (breakdown or disorder) is increasing, and thus natural processes must also be breaking down – not building up or “evolving” into something more complicated as postulated by the hypothesis of evolution..

Simple observation empirically confirms the truth of the second (2nd) law of thermodynamics. Paint on a house chips and peels. Dust builds up. The house itself falls into disrepair if preventative steps are not taken. Living things die & rot & finally decompose. We can observe the results of the second (2nd) law of thermodynamics every day.

The hypothesis of evolution however, requires much more than just a simple change in entropy (breakdown or disorder). For evolution to be valid, the theory requiresmore than water freezing or the formation of salt crystals or dust collecting into a solar system. To evolve from non-life, matter on Earth would have to constantly, consistently, and directly move “AGAINST” the force of entropy (breakdown or disorder). However, this is “scientifically impossible”.

DNA is NOT a result of naturalistic evolution as the science of DNA has proven.

Evolutionists claim that life evolved in very small, simple mutational steps over billions of years in an open system like Earth.

But mutations “ARE” entropy (breakdown or disorder) and mutations occurring in a constant, beneficial manner “ARE” a violation of the unbreakable, scientific, second (2nd) Law of Thermodynamics.

2nd Conclusion:

The first (1st) & second (2nd) scientific laws of thermodynamics are fixed, rigid, consistent & unbreakable. Nothing in our natural world – including the hypothesis of evolution – can violate them.Except according to science, an Act of God.

3) Since 2013 NASA & SETI astrobiologists have acknowledged that all DNA originates from an intelligence outside of the observation of our current utilities.

So in light of this, a belief in the God of Creation is “not unwarranted” – or at least, not dismissed without rational consideration.

To illustrate further, all plant, animal & human DNA requires three (3) critical components;

a) information

b) communication

c) language.

Genuine science views DNA as a marker of intelligence NOT evidence of biochemical evolutionary processes. In simple terms; DNA cannot be “made” by biological evolution.

So, the science of DNA “rules out” all plant, animal & human life observed yesterday & today as the current end game of the hypothesis of evolution.

Why is this not common knowledge?

Andrew Kibler provides an responsible explanation in his post of Dec 4 2018;

“Science can take a good 5 to 10 years before it even begins to become mainstream. That’s on a good note though. People’s beliefs, worldviews and careers are on the line with some scientific discoveries, so it could take even longer. When it was discovered that light had “travel time” it wasn’t instantaneouslyaaccepted. It took 50 years to become mainstream after some hard battles”.

So, using the Laws of Logic;

d) DNA exists in all plant, animal & human life.

e) DNA is not the product of naturalistic evolution.

f) DNA is a marker of intelligence.

g) Logically, DNA is the product of something outside of the utilities of science.

h) The certaincy of scientific law leaves us mere humans with a couple of alternatives. In Western civilization the intellegence that creates intricate individual DNA is commonly referred to as the God of the Bible

i) Or aliens, if God is too hard a pill to swallow.

J) Panspermia & Directed Panspermia – a possible scientific alternative to God “or” evolution, involving aliens has zero evidence & the hypothesis remains on the fringes of credibility.

k) Finally, modern physics has demonstrated that consciousness mind does exist independent of matter. Mind & matter can & do interact.

l)This is a game-changer for the scientism, atheistic obsessed, as there is now no scientific basis for denying God’s existence.

3rd & Final Conclusion:

According to the scientific first (1st) & second (2nd) Laws of Thermodynamics it is impossible for the hypothesis of evolution to occur.

According to the science of DNA, it is impossible for DNA to be created by an evolutionary naturalistic process.

Which leaves: Evidence + Belief + Faith = God.

And because God exists, it follows that He created everything, including us.

Sunday, March 17, 2013

A group of scientists are close to recognizing that there “might” be a God. They are astrobiologists.

S.E.T.I. stands for “Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence” and comprises several groups of scientists that were combining their expertise to try to discover if there is intelligent life anywhere out in the universe. [1]

In order to decide how they would recognize intelligent life, they had to determine some basic criteria that they could apply to observed phenomena that would characterize only intelligent origins. For example, if they saw certain patterns like Morse Code in a radio transmission, infra-red radiation, or gamma ray bursts, they would be certain that it had originated only at an intelligent source.

Since the early 1980s they have never detected any intelligent life anywhere else in the universe.

Recently however a couple of these scientists, Vladimir I. Cherbak and Maxim A. Makukovb, had the bright idea to apply the criteria they had created for SETI to the results of the DNA studies that have emerged. The conclusion was exactly one word, “Wow!”. [2]

They found that DNA shows patterns that could only have been created by intelligence. The odds of an error were less than 1 in 10 (exp) 13. (1 in 10 trillion). Their conclusion is that DNA is not random, but is the definite result of an “intelligence”.

The astrobiologists published their conclusions in a peer-reviewed journal in their field named Icarus. [3]. Peer-reviewed means that other experts in the same field have poured over their work and conclusions and have given it their consensus.

Click on the link below in [3] if you want to see some of the article and the charts of DNA that show the clear proof of intelligent design.

It’s likely you haven’t heard about this if you aren’t in the field. But it must be causing head scratching through a lot of research institutes and concern among evolutionists. It takes courage for these scientists to come forth and go against the entrenched dogma of evolutionists and the backlash that will surely come. But the truth will win out because it can’t be suppressed indefinitely.

[1] S.E.T.I. Wikipedia. Search for extraterrestrial intelligence – Wikipedia

“The search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) is the collective name for a number of activities people undertake to search for intelligent extraterrestrial life. SETI projects use scientific methods in this search. For example, electromagnetic radiation is monitored for signs of transmissions from civilizations on other worlds. Some of the most well known projects are run by Harvard University, the University of California, Berkeley and the SETI Institute.”

[2] The “Wow! signal” of the terrestrial genetic code. Vladimir I. shCherbak, Maxim A. Makukovb

ScienceDirect

Excerpt from the Abstract: “Here we show that the terrestrial code displays a thorough precision-type orderliness matching the criteria to be considered an informational signal. Simple arrangements of the code reveal an ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of the same symbolic language. Accurate and systematic, these underlying patterns appear as a product of precision logic and nontrivial computing rather than of stochastic processes (the null hypothesis that they are due to chance coupled with presumable evolutionary pathways is rejected with P-value < 10 (exp) –13). The patterns display readily recognizable hallmarks of artificiality, among which are the symbol of zero, the privileged decimal syntax and semantical symmetries. Besides, extraction of the signal involves logically straightforward but abstract operations, making the patterns essentially irreducible to natural origin.”

[3] Icarus Issue available online March 6, 2013. Wikipedia: Icarus (journal) – Wikipedia

“Icarus is a premier scientific journal dedicated to the field of planetary science. It is published under the auspices of the American Astronomical Society’s Division for Planetary Sciences (DPS). The journal contains articles discussing the results of new research on astronomy, geology, meteorology, physics, chemistry, biology, and other scientific aspects of the Solar System or extrasolar systems.

Source: Vladimir I. shCherbak & Maxim A. Makukovb: Icarus Journal May 2013.

 

Resources: The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism: Philip Johnson. Publisher, Intervarsity Press. Downers Grove, Illinois USA.

Ultimate Proof: Resolving the Origins Debate by Dr Jason Lisle. Publisher: New Leaf Publishing Group, Inc.

Heisenberg Uncertainty (indeterminacy) Principle: Dr Mario Beauregard, Dr Henry Stapp, Dr Richard Conn Henry, J.P. Moreland.

Psychology and Religion by Carl G Jung. Publisher: Yale University Press.

New Bible Commentary 21st Century Edition. Intervarsity Press. Leicester England.

Vladimir I. shCherback and Maxim A. Makukorb, Icarus Journal May 2013.

Is God a Delusion: Dr John Lennox 14 March 2015. YouTube.

The Mind and the Brain: Dr Jeffery M. Schwartz. Publisher Haper Collins.

Images: Google.

Copyright: Gavin Hurlimann 2019 

   
     

Discover more from New2view's Blog

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

One response to “Evolution vs Creation

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Pingback: Creators’ Art! | New2view's Blog

Leave a Reply

Discover more from New2view's Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading